top of page

Strengthening Intergenerational Work

This piece is co-authored by Cherie Brown and was originally published in Waging Nonviolence.

As trainers, coaches and activists on Israel-Palestine issues, we have found ourselves in the middle of many heated intergenerational arguments. Disagreements can range from campaign tactics to who is most to blame for the continuing conflict.

Cherie recalls a time shortly after the 2014 Israel-Gaza war, when a young Jewish woman screamed at her during a training session. “Why isn’t your generation outraged about what is being done by Israel to Palestinians? Why aren’t you with us in the streets?” she said. Cherie thought for a long time afterwards about what she asked of her. As a young adult, Cherie was in the streets to protest the Vietnam War. She has certainly fought hard for decades to end the occupation. But why wasn’t she protesting in the streets now? Is there a generational divide in how we’re approaching the Israeli-Palestinian conflict now?

Cherie’s reflection highlights some of the challenges facing intergenerational work on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict among U.S. Jews. Many elder Jews, who have worked diligently to build Jewish peace organizations in the U.S. to resolve the conflict, came of age shortly after the Holocaust and the founding of the state of Israel. Their views on Israel would understandably be more mixed or even sympathetic than the views of many young adult Jews, who came of age after 1967 and have only known the occupation and Israeli military rule over Palestinians.

There can be a tendency among elders to discount important, fresh thinking and organization building of young adults. And there can be a tendency among young adults to sideline elders, thinking they had their chance and now it’s time to step out of the way. These prejudicial attitudes need to be addressed or strong intergenerational work on Israel-Palestine will falter.

To explore intergenerational concerns for U.S. Jewish activists on the issue of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and to demonstrate a model for bridging these struggles, we embarked on a program with leaders in IfNotNow. While Cherie contributed to the beginnings of New Jewish Agenda and Brit Tzedek v’Shalom, Andrew was involved in the launch of IfNotNow — a U.S. Jewish social justice organization focused on Israel-Palestine and ending American Jewish support for the occupation.

At its founding in 2014, IfNotNow made a strategic decision to focus its outreach and membership on young adult Jews — to unite them symbolically as the future of the Jewish community. While engaging young Jews has been the primary focus to date, IfNotNow has been assessing how to remain a youth-led movement while also examining ways to work with elders. This assessment has been a part of a broader strategic planning process that will culminate in a re-launch of the movement in the spring.

This was a perfect moment to put together a series of intergenerational sessions for IfNotNow to explore young adult Jews reaching for common ground and understanding with Jewish elders. We had an even 50-50 split of young adult and elder participants. Each young adult either invited an elder to participate with them or was paired with an elder who applied separately. Twenty six people participated in the three-part workshop series, which took place in the fall of 2020.

The activities and lessons learned from these sessions informed our recommendations for building strong intergenerational coalitions.

Understanding adultism and ageism

Not surprisingly, age-based bias and discrimination are obstacles that can interfere with intergenerational collaboration. Therefore, we need a common understanding of adultism (the discrimination of young people) and ageism (the discrimination of elders).

According to Jewish Youth for Community Action, adultism is the everyday, systematic and institutionalized oppression that young people face at the hands of adults. Young people are born with capable, intelligent minds. Even so, some adults assume that young people’s thinking isn’t worthwhile, and they can’t make their own choices. In reality, what young people often lack is much needed context to make decisions. Instead of providing that context and then letting young people choose for themselves, adults often made those decisions for them.

We were all young people at one point in time, so we’ve all felt the effects of adultism. We may have internalized negative messages out there about young people. Then, as we grow older, we tend to accept societal hierarchy based on age, thereby conditioning us to accept hierarchies based on other identities such as sexism, racism, ableism and others.

What can young people do to combat adultism? Practice speaking up in any situation. Make decisions and notice how those decisions play out.

What can elders do to combat adultism? Ask young people what they think before sharing your perspective. Refrain from giving unsolicited advice. When prompted, provide young people with context, and then allow them to make their own choices. This will help young people build confidence in their own thinking.

Ageism is the discrimination of elders. The word choice of elder is deliberate: It is a term of respect often used by Native and Indigenous peoples to demonstrate honor for older people in their communities.

There are many institutional examples of ageism, including mandatory retirement regulations in many fields, age discrimination in hiring, healthcare priorities that exclude elders (for example, prioritizing younger patients for ventilators during COVID shortages) and the assumption that all cognitive difficulties must be a “natural” result of aging instead of the result of an illness that needs attention and treatment (for example, many elders get confused when they have bladder infections, but instead of testing for these infections, doctors will just assume the confusion is a sign of aging and dementia).

There are many negative messages given to elders every day. Examples include: “You are ‘over the hill;’” “You aren’t needed any more;” “You are irrelevant.” Elders internalize these messages, believe they are true, and then act that way and even treat other elders with disdain. Elders might feel ashamed of looking older and feel compelled to dye their hair, get skin wrinkle treatments, etc.

What can elders do to combat ageism? Remember that you still have valuable contributions to make and participate fully alongside young people in movement work.

What can young people do to combat ageism? Seek out elders to learn from their experiences.

Skills and practices

Drawing on curriculum from the National Coalition Building Institute and our experiences as facilitators, we designed and delivered a three-part program for IfNotNow to explore opportunities and obstacles for working across age. Former IfNotNow staffer Danielle Raskin and volunteer leaders including Rel Bendahan played significant roles in the execution, and we are grateful for their insights and support. The experience involved the following skills and practices:

  1. Learning to be effective allies to each other. We separated into caucuses of young adults and elders to brainstorm hurtful messages we’ve encountered due to our age. Young adult responses included, “I don’t want to be given unsolicited advice and then blamed for not taking that advice,” and “I don’t want to hear, ‘You don’t know what it was like when Jews were scared’ — as if we’re not scared today.” Elder responses included, “I don’t want to hear, ‘Get out of the way, it’s our turn,’ or that our only role is to back the younger generation and not to work in partnership,” and “Don’t assume that if we have concerns about BDS [the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions movement] we are stupid or racist.” Many participants found it cathartic to voice these messages in the caucuses. When we reconvened and shared our lists with the rest of the group, participants felt seen and heard. Participants also found deep empathy while listening to each others’ reports.

  2. Listening to heartfelt concerns underneath divisive issues. We led participants through a process to identify and discuss a controversial issue. The group decided to focus on the question “Does the existence of a Jewish state help keep Jews safe?” The group was divided on this question. We then asked for volunteers to represent each side. It’s not a coincidence that an elder took the affirmative position (that a Jewish state does help keep Jews safe) and a young adult took the opposing position. The elder’s reasoning included “History has shown that a safe haven for Jews is necessary” and “Jewish control of government is necessary to keep Jews safe.” The young adult’s reasoning included “Nationalism is not an ideology that makes people safer” and “We are safer finding solidarity with other marginalized people.” Despite being on opposing sides of the issue, the volunteers were able to bridge and form a relationship through deep listening and reflecting back what they heard. A key piece of this activity included soliciting a personal story that exemplified the heart of the matter for each person. These stories challenged assumptions and facilitated connection through the experience of being witnessed by the other. Then participants were ready to reframe the issue in a way that could build bridges between them. For example, participants reframed the original question to: “How can we ensure Jewish safety without threatening the safety of other people?” The listening process shed light on a deep care beneath opposing stances.

  3. Telling stories to bridge age differences. One practical way to build bridges between young adult and elder activists is to engage in listening exchanges that enable each to communicate their stories. We held listening sessions and panels where elders who had been working on Israel-Palestine issues got to share lessons learned over decades of work. One such lesson was the need for Jews to do this work alongside others — not isolated — in the context of a broader movement that now sees justice for Palestinians as a natural part of an anti-racist agenda. Similarly, young adults had equal time to speak about their activism and takeaways, which included how frequently Israel is at the heart of intra-communal strife and the heartbreak of facing the intersections of antisemitism and anti-Palestinian racism. Reflecting on the stories, a young adult participant shared, “I realized how starved I am to hear from movement elders.” An elder noted that one of the young adult panelists had a strong understanding of how long it can take for change to happen, but showed a lot more positivity about the progress being made, which “made me feel better.” One cautionary note: We observed in these listening exchanges that younger activists had a harder time offering a strong set of lessons learned while in the presence of elder activists. Adultism can lead young people and young adults to discredit their own knowledge, and it needs to be challenged regularly. Otherwise it can appear that elders have more to communicate about lessons learned, which in reality is not accurate. Both elders and young adults engaging in activism need to claim their righteous voices in the work.

There’s clearly an appetite for intergenerational collaboration in our movement work, whether the issue is Israel-Palestine, the climate emergency, immigration or others. We must invest in political education around the issues of adultism and ageism if we are to successfully build multigenerational coalitions. The key is to take a relational approach and be able to listen deeply to one another. As one young adult participant reflected after our final session, “There is room for everyone and we need everyone… The movement needs us to be ready to hear from each other.”


bottom of page